|
4113 Home |
Project: Case Study |
<Back |
|
The purpose is to use your knowledge of the legislative process
to explain the development and shaping of legislation. In general, you
will produce individual or group case
studies of national policies (which may consist of one or more pieces of legislation in one or more congresses) and trace
the policy as it goes through the legislative process. Use the assigned readings as a guide (however, you may NOT use any legislation
discussed in the texts). DO NOT begin without clearing a topic
with me. Click here for a list of ineligible topics.
|
|
This is an individual or group project.
Individual projects should be more than 12
full pages. Groups are limited to 3 members. Please
select one member to be "Team Co-ordinator". This person is responsible for writing the project's introduction and for crafting the
group's work into one integrated project. While each group turns in one project, each person is expected to contribute
more than 7 written pages (in individual, identifiable sections), on average
(so a typical group of 3 should write 21+ pages). Note: Page length minimums do not include title pages; pictures, tables, charts/graphs covering more than 1/3 of a page; or bibliography.
|
| Timetable |
| ASAP |
Consider broad topics;
potential partners |
| ~10/16 |
Collect potential sources
(COMPLETE citation info) |
| ~10/09 |
Update sources, focus topic (approval
required) |
| 10/21 |
Annotated bibliography due
8pm |
| 10/24 |
Annotated outline due
5pm (keep
updating sources) |
| 11/06 |
Project due 5pm (but your work is
not yet done) |
| 11/11-20 |
Presentations (keep updating
sources) |
| 12/12-14 |
Revisions due (use feedback to
improve project) |
|
Grading: Project,
Presentation, and Revision are each
10% of your course grade.
Scale: A+=10 points, A=9.5, A-=9, B+=8.8, B=8.5, B-=8, C+=7.8, C=7.5, C-=7...
|
|
Important: You will lose 1/2 to 1 point (or more) for failure to meet each requirement.
Grading note: For groups of 3+, 2 points of the project and revision grades are determined using the "World Series" share method.
|
|
|
|
Topics:
Your case study must examine legislative
proposals that have at least
come up for a final vote before
both houses of Congress. It may be either contemporary or historic
legislation (but be wary of historic legislation as sources may be
harder to come by). Your project should illustrate your understanding of
what we’ve learned in class. You must get my approval (use the
ProjectSubmissionForm-update.pdf document in the
“Some project guidelines” D2L
announcement. The case study must make significant use of class
material (but it must not
be a mere restatement of
that material).
Research Guide:
POLS 4113 Research Resources
|
|
Your work should include
background, specific examples, and
analysis. Demostrate your knowledge of class
material. |
|
Fundamental Considerations |
Project Basics |
Project Components |
|
^ Be sure to check out and carefully read each of the above three links
^ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UNG |
POLITICAL SCIENCE |
PROJECT DIGNITY |
DISCLAIMER |
|
Fundamental
Considerations
For research guidelines, please consult:
POLS 4113 Research Resources.
- You need to discuss background.
Policies do not appear out of nowhere. They develop over
time. They are recognized, considered, and addressed over time.
You should discuss why the policy you are exploring was proposed
when it was (i.e., why now, why not one, ten, or fifty
years ago?). What now existed in the environment that
was missing prior? What finally got things going? Use judgment:
you need not cover the nation's history to provide adequate
background.
- You need to discuss dynamics.
Initial proposals never survive intact (which is why
there's a process!). What caused the changes?
Did society or public opinion shift—and if so, why? To what are
the changes attributable? —the people involved? —the positions
they hold? —the President or the presidency? —the Congress or
its nature? —the committee system? —the differences between the
House and Senate? —the budget cycle? —the legislative process
itself? What about political parties, interest groups
and/or their campaign contributions, or the electoral cycle?
Your policy may not involve all these factors, but it must
involve several of them.
The single best
source is Congressional Quarterly (CQ).
They publish a
Weekly Report and an annual Almanac that both
focus on federal legislation. The almanac (if you can access it)
is a good place to start as it references the weekly publication (NOTE:
CQ Researcher may also help, but
DON'T confuse this with their legislative sites).
These may be supplemented by both academic journals (for theory
and analysis) and news magazines (for detailed coverage and
analysis). Both academic journals and news magazines are
valuable sources. Supplement these with daily newspaper accounts
and internet sources. There are also many Internet sources to assist you.
Two trustworthy sites are
Roll Call
and The Hill.
One caution—use discretion. There are no content restrictions on the Internet, and there is a lot of junk out there! Avoid personal sites in favor of sites attached to established organizations.
Please consult:
POLS 4113 Research Resources.
You must also research the issues and theories behind your topic. The best starting place is GALILEO, where you can search a wide variety of academic journals by author, title, or keyword). Finally, our library's shortcomings are not excuses for an under-researched project. Good research is never limited to one location. Plan on both using inter-library loans (and plan on that early, because it takes time) and on traveling to other libraries (e.g., UGA, Kennesaw, Georgia State).
Our library is the first place to look, but it is not the last! If you cannot find the information you need there, look elsewhere. |
(top)
|
Project Basics
Automatic deductions for all project components (failure to meet each and any requirement for any component will result in a grade reduction as noted):
- Project length (see below for each component)—partial pages (no matter how much) do not count. As noted above, minimums do not include any title pages; pictures, tables, charts/graphs covering more than 1/3 of a page; or bibliography. Deduction: 1 point per page.
- Formatting—Your project must be divided into labeled sections (see component 2, below). Deduction: 1 point.
- Formatting—12-point or smaller Times or
Calibri font,
double-spaced, 1-inch or smaller margins (If you use an older version of
Word—2003 and earlier—you need to change the 1.25" default margins. For help
with this, click here). Deduction: 1/2 point each for font, spacing, and margins.
- Citations/References—Minimum number of references (see
Project Components, below),
APA style for citations/references. APA exceptions: Page numbering must begin with text, not cover page; Quotes of more than three lines must be single-spaced with 1/2" or 5 character additional margins (NOTE: too many long quotes harms your grade); All bibliographic entries must be single-spaced with one space between entries. Deduction: 1 point each for number and style.
- File—must be submitted to Turnitin.com by the due date/time for each component. The file must be in either Word format (.doc
or .docx) or WordPerfect format (.wpd). NOTE: if you use Microsoft Works, you must save your file as a Word (.doc
or .docx) file and not as a Works (.wps) file (Turnitin.com does not accept Works files). Click here for help on saving a Works document as a Word file. Deduction: 1 point per day.
|
(top)
|
Project
Components
For research guidelines,
please consult: POLS 4113 Research Resources.
- Annotated Bibliography—3
points. The purpose of this is to explore the major literature
associated with your topic and to refine your specific proposal. Minimum 8
academic references in addition to any course readings (NOTE: 1 point deduction from project for each reference, beyond
half, not used). In your "annotation", provide 1) a brief description
of the literature, and 2) a discussion of why it is relevant to your
work. Your references should be limited to MAJOR academic literature in the field (not just ANY literature—no newspaper or magazine articles for this part of your project). Use your texts as guides (Check endnotes and references).
- Annotated Outline (2 page minimum)—2 points. The annotated outline is a formally ordered, descriptive account of each of the
specific sections (see component #3, below, for a general outline) of your project. In other words, you will explain each section of your project. NOTES: 1) Be concise, don't overplan—an outline of
30+ sections and sub-sections for an 21-page paper (i.e., less than one page per section
or sub-section) is not a good sign! 2) You must discuss how you will use the sources covered in your annotated bibliography.
- Project—10 points. You must divide your project
into sections. Groups must assign each section
to a particular person.
Sections (You need not have these exact headings, but you must have similar sections with some heading):
- Introduction: What is your topic? Why did you select it? Why should anyone care?
1-3 pages.
- Background/History: Provide readers with relevant history and context. Concentrate on
fundamental #1 (above). 5-10 pages.
- Analysis: Concentrate on
fundamental #2 (above). Apply our class (but don't just repeat—build !).
5-10 pages.
- Conclusion: Wrap up (but do not just summarize). What did you learn? Does it differ in any way from what we've learned in class?
1-3 pages.
- Bibliography: Minimum of 11 references in
addition to one or more class readings and at
least 4 from academic books or refereed academic journals. All
references must be cited in the project. At minimum, 50% of your references must be print (non-internet) references (online resources that also appear in print
may count as print references if they are properly cited as such).
- Presentation—10 points. Presentations will be 10
to 20 minutes, depending upon the number of presentations. You must provide an outline page for class—one class prior to your presentation. Presentations are class activities—two points of everyone's class participation will be determined during presentations.
- Revision—10 points. Make significant use of feedback from me (on your project and presentation), and the from the class (on your presentation). You must
make revisions to maintain your grade. A revision that is identical to,
or substantially similar to, the project you submitted earlier will
receive a lower grade. All prior project requirements apply to your revision as well.
|
| (top) |