SUPPORT CAMILLE MARINO
Unjustly
incarcerated in a New Mexico jail
By Barry D. Friedman, Ph.D.
UPDATE.
Camille was released from the Doña
Ana County Detention Center on July 20, 2015. Thank you for your support. |
For several years, Camille A. Marino has been dedicated to the effort to stop
the torture, mutilation, and murder of animals in research laboratories of the
University of Florida. This university, like others, desperately wants its
faculty members and other employees to "experiment" on animals, because the
"experiments" attract grant money offered by the U. S. national government.
It seems to be a fact of life that, when someone like Camille presents a
challenge to the continued flow of grant money to a university, she is perceived
by the following kinds of people to be a threat that must be neutralized:
● The university that desperately wants the revenue.
● The university's employees who receive a portion of the revenue and who
receive other rewards, possibly including tenure and promotions.
● Similar institutions that want to "experiment" on animals and various
agricultural and industrial entities that fear new policies that may interfere
with their
profitable exploitation of animals.
● Rivals in the animal-welfare and animal-rights movement who do not want to be overshadowed by
her.
During her years as an advocate for the animals, Camille has been threatened,
arrested, and imprisoned any number of times by people and institutions in the
aforementioned categories who have wanted to put an end to her expressions of
speech and her organization of public assemblies. Every police officer,
prosecuting attorney, and judge would be presumed fully aware of the plain
fact that Camille's speech and assemblies are protected by the First Amendment
of the U. S. Constitution. Therefore, every time she has been arrested and
imprisoned, the authorities who have ordered and implemented these measures have
done so knowing full well that they were acting in flagrant violation of the law
of the land.
They don't care. It is a horrifying feature of American government,
politics, and law that an individual will get as much justice as he can afford,
and no more than that. You are welcome to read
my sobering lecture
titled "Judicial Power." Camille does not have money, and, therefore,
she has gotten no justice. The University of Florida has dispatched its
paid police officers to arrest her. When another animal-rights activist
with access to Camille's Web site posted an essay threatening a butcher of animals at Wayne State University
in Detroit, the University of Florida
paid for
Camille's transport in a prison van to Michigan, where she faced
prosecution for posting that essay, although she was not the author. Can you
imagine? When a Florida citizen criticizes UF for carving up animals in
laboratories, UF‑‑an agency of the state government of Florida‑‑has money in its
budget to pay for the citizen's deportation out of Florida! Some guarantee
of free speech!
Camille and the aforementioned activist, a resident of New Mexico, proceeded to
have a very public falling out. Much of it appeared online.
I would think that it is unfortunate for fellow animal-rights activists to
engage in acrimony, but it seems to me that both of them possess the
constitutional right to insult each other. However, Camille's rival, who
has access to many more resources than Camille does, petitioned a New Mexico
court for a "domestic violence" order and got it. This happened despite
the fact that
Camille lives
in Florida, not New Mexico; that she never engaged in domestic
violence or threats of physical harm; and, therefore, that the court
had no
jurisdiction over Camille. Nevertheless, a New Mexico judge
[Darren M. Kugler; see article about him that appears below]
ordered Camille to be extradited to New Mexico and, upon her arrival, sentenced
her in February 2015 to
6 months of
incarceration in a county detention center for violating the protective
order because she posted on the Internet regarding the falling out with her
former ally. The judge also banned her from the Internet, another
violation of her right to free speech. Camille cannot pay
the enormous legal bills that this absurd situation has necessitated, and has no
money to appeal this unjust decision, even though the New Mexico protective
order will remain in effect for 12 years and her rival intends to wield it like
a club against her if she dares to try to exercise her right to free speech.
This is the sad state of American justice.
This is a country in which courts ruled, pursuant to the First Amendment, that
neo‑Nazis, clad in Nazi uniforms, were welcome to parade in Skokie, Ill., a
Chicago suburb that has been home to many Jewish survivors of the Nazi Holocaust,
and express Hitler's ideology of hatred and intimidation. This is a
country in which courts ruled, pursuant to the First Amendment, that fanatical
organizers of the "Westboro Baptist Church" were welcome to noisily protest near
funerals of brave men and women killed in military service to our country and
display picket signs expressing their incomprehensible rationale that "G•d hates
fags."
However,
it is increasingly apparent that, in our country, neither the First Amendment
nor the other panoply of constitutional provisions, laws, Supreme Court
opinions, and rules for judicial proceedings protects
somebody who
takes the wanton torture and destruction of animals personally and vehemently
protests those acts of brutality.
The crackdown
on grassroots animal-rights activists like Camille, while fascists, bigots, and
theocratic traitors are free to disseminate their vicious propaganda, is not
random. It amounts to a conscious policy of state
governments and the national government to protect every industry that butchers
innocent animals, because those industries are flush with cash and state- and
national-government officials aspire to capture a piece of that action.
All of
them want the slaughter of animals to persist, and so Camille
must be kept incommunicado. She is in jail for 6 months, and‑‑make no
mistake‑‑this is only Round 1 for this brave woman. Her enemies will do
whatever they can to keep her there for years, because they are so threatened by
what she wants to say about what happens to innocent animals in research
laboratories. Why shouldn't they be able to keep her in jail, when the
court's decisions are based exclusively on the cavalier rule of "because I have
the unilateral power to steamroll her"?
If you relate to Camille's passionate devotion to the well-being of animals, and
if you believe in the right of every American to express and expose the truth, it
makes perfect sense that you should care about Camille, just like I do. If
you care about Camille,
please support
Camille, just like I do. Here are two ways in which you can
show your support for Camille:
Please, on occasion, write a letter to Camille. Here is her mailing
address:
INOPERATIVE (Camille was released on July 20, 2015. Thank you for your kind messages.)
The jail's authorities have established a list of rules to which your letter
must conform, or else the letter will simply be returned to you.
Before you
start writing your letter, please review these rules. They
appear on the Web page at this URL address:
https://www.donaanacounty.org/detention/mail
Be aware that every letter that you write to Camille will be read by the jail's
authorities. As you write your letter, just assume that you are submitting
it for public consumption. Simply write to Camille, let her know that you
are thinking about her, and give her some encouragement. She will be
perfectly happy to read about your devotion to the animals in
your
life.
2. PROVIDE A FINANCIAL GIFT TO CAMILLE'S COMMISSARY ACCOUNT
The money in Camille's commissary account allows her to pay for food that is
compatible with her vegan diet, clothing, toiletries, postage, and telephone
calls. It allows her to maintain her very limited contact with the outside
world.
Please purchase a
money order,
payable to "[inoperative]." Mail the money order to this
address:
INOPERATIVE (Camille was released on July 20, 2015. Thank you for your kind support.)
Do not enclose anything in the envelope other than the money order. If you
enclose any type of note or other object, the letter will simply be returned to
you.
Please tell all of your friends‑‑every friend of animals whom you know‑‑about
Camille and ask them to support her, too. Feel free to write to me at
bfriedman@UNG.edu . Send me a
message that I can post below, and I'll gladly do so (be sure to tell me your
name and state or country). Show those who want to crush Camille's
campaign on behalf of the animals in the University of Florida's torture
chambers that, like Camille, you do not intend to allow that horror to go on
unexposed to public scrutiny.
Las Cruces district judge permanently resigns from
bench
Carlos Andres López ,
Las Cruces Sun-News
Published 5:46 p.m. MT Feb. 14, 2017 | Updated 6:15
p.m. MT Feb. 14, 2017
Kugler, a Democrat who was elected in 2012, tendered his permanent
resignation on Jan. 3 in lieu of further disciplinary proceedings by the
Judicial Standards Commission. His resignation, effective Jan. 31, was
accepted by the New Mexico Supreme Court on Feb. 1.
Kugler had been under investigation by the Judicial Standards
Commission since June 9, 2016, according to documents that were unsealed
by the Supreme Court. In the commissions’ agreement for his resignation,
Kugler admitted that during a hearing on Nov. 10, 2015, he failed to
comply with contempt law and violated the due process for two parents
involved in an ongoing custody case. Kugler held the parents in contempt without providing notice of
specific conduct that warranted such action. The parents were sentenced
to jail and served their time. He also admitted to similar accusations stemming from a Dec. 11,
2015, hearing involving the same case and the same parents. He further
admitted that during the December hearing, he violated one of the
parent's Fifth Amendment right and subjected him to double jeopardy when
he was held in contempt a second time. And during six separate hearings in the same case, between 2014-15,
Kugler admitted that he failed to be dignified, patient and courteous to
both parents “by shouting or raising his voice and by making belittling,
condescending, derisive, inappropriate and disparaging remarks,”
documents in the agreement state. He also admitted that he failed to be
impartial in the case. Neither Kugler’s attorney, Matthew G. Watson of Las Cruces, nor the
court’s chief executive officer, Claude Bowman, immediately returned
calls for comment on Tuesday. In a written response to the allegations, submitted in October,
Kugler said he was “misguided in his efforts to protect” the parents’
minor child from “further abuse.” He acknowledged that his efforts “led
to poor decision making.” He said he had “lowered his standards to lowest common denominator”
in response to the behavior of one of the parents, which he described as
“appalling and beyond frustrating.” Still, he informed the commission that he understood the “need to
remain objective.” “(J)udges cannot and should not let sympathies, or other emotions
influence his decisions, and must ensure all due process are provided by
litigants,” his response reads. Meanwhile, the search is underway for Kugler's replacement. The 3rd Judicial District Court Judicial Nominating Commission is
accepting applications to fill the court’s vacancy until 5 p.m.
Thursday. Applications can be obtained from the Judicial Selection
website: http://lawschool.unm.edu/judsel/application.php. The nominating commission will hold a public meeting at 9 a.m. Feb.
23 to interview applicants for the position, according to the University
of New Mexico School of Law. The commission will then make
recommendations to the governor on candidates for possible appointment
to the vacant judgeship. The appointed judge would then need to run for re-election in 2018. “The person appointed by the governor, if they want to keep the
position, must run for partisan election in the next election,” Barry
Massey, a spokesman for the Administrative Office of the Court, said in
a statement. “The appointed judge would first run in the primary
election, and if they win their party's nomination, will appear on the
general election ballot.” Carlos Andres López can be reached 575-541-5453, carlopez@lcsun-news.com or @carlopez_los on
Twitter. |
Note:
The preceding statement of opinion was written by Barry D. Friedman
upon his own initiative. Camille A. Marino was not involved in its
composition or the process of making it available to the public. |
Judith Shipstad Los Gatos, Calif. April 14, 2015 |
Few people have worked as tirelessly as Camille to bring animal abuse to the public's attention. It's my hope that the public will now come to her aid with the financial and moral support that she so deserves. May those at the university who have harassed her for her whistleblowing fall to the wayside, and may the former ally who has betrayed her desist in his ill-spirited accusations. Let us rally around her when she is released and provide the assistance she will need to continue her work. You go, Girl! |
Janis Keller Pembroke Pines, Fla. March 3, 2015 |
I really admire Camille Marino. She is
passionate about saving the abused monkeys at the University of Florida.
Not too many people have the guts she has to face her enemies down. I don't think that anyone who is an animal-rights activist should want to send her to jail. We are all in this together, fighting abuse. We should not fight each other. Camille does not belong in jail. She has a G•d-given ability to feel compassion for animals and to tell it like it is. I support Camille all the way. When I move up to North Florida, I plan to join Camille in her fight. |
Personal disclaimer: This page is not a publication of the University of North Georgia and UNG has not edited or examined the content of the page. The author of the page is solely responsible for the content.
Return to my animal-experimentation home page . . .
Return to Barry Friedman's home page . . .
Accessibility
Last updated on February 27, 2017,
by Barry D. Friedman.